Remembering 9/11
The Bloody Deception!
The Biggest Lie Ever!
The Mockery of Science,
Justice, Logic & Reason!
It Was A Horrible Fraud
And They Got Away With It!
(M. Javed Naseem)
“When it is said to them: 'Make not mischief
on the earth,' they say: 'Why, we only want to
make peace!' Of a surety, they are the ones
who make mischief, but they realize (it) not.”
(al-Quran 2:11-12)
President John F. Kennedy said: "In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility. I welcome it." -- JFK, inaugural address Jan. 20, 1961.
It has been 25 years now and people are still waiting for the truth. People have been lied to and deceived. They have been deprived of their basic human rights, civil liberties and free speech in the name of ‘security’ triggered by the fraudulent ‘war on terror’ by an evil empire. The saga is ridiculously called 9/11 – 9.1.1, a nationwide emergency-help number, which was carefully planned for September 11, to coincide. Without any comments and details, let’s go to the opinions of the experts!
Former CIA officer and commercial jet pilot John Lear has sworn an affidavit stating the Twin Towers were NOT brought to the ground by planes crashing into them on 9/11.
From 'patriotsquestion911':
41
U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans Challenge the
Official Account of 9/11 – Official
Account of 9/11: “Terribly Flawed,” “Laced with
Contradictions,” “a Joke,” “a Cover-up”.
Senior
Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials
Question
the 9/11 Commission Report.
Many
well known and respected senior U.S. military officers, intelligence
services and law enforcement veterans, and government officials have
expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report or have
made public statements that contradict the Report. Several even
allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/11. This
page of the website is a collection of their statements. The website
does not represent any
organization
and it should be made clear that none of these individuals are
affiliated with this website.
Listed
below are statements by more than 220 of these senior officials.
Their collective voices give credibility to the claim that the 9/11
Commission Report is tragically flawed. These individuals cannot be
simply dismissed as irresponsible believers in some 9/11 conspiracy
theory. Their sincere concern, backed by their decades of service to
their country, demonstrate that criticism of the Report is not
irresponsible, illogical, nor disloyal, per se. In fact, it can be
just the opposite.
Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (ret)– Former Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 1981 - 1984, commanding 15,000 intelligence and security personnel. Also commanded the U.S. Army’s Electronic Research and Development Command and the U.S. Army’s Intelligence School and Center. Former head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence. 32-year Army career. Member,Military Intelligence Hall of Fame.Video interview 6/28/09:
General Stubblebine: I am Major General Albert Stubblebine. I am retired Army Major-General. In my last assignment -- my last command -- I was responsible for all of the Army's strategic intelligence forces around the world. I had responsibility for the Signals Intelligence, Photo Intelligence, Counter Intelligence, Human Intelligence. They all belonged to me, in my last assignment. …
I
was supposed to find out what the enemy was doing, before the enemy
did it so that we could take action against the enemy. That's
Intelligence, OK, before the fact. So, we always -- always -- rely
not on a single piece of data, before we make a statement, but on
multiple and the more pieces of data that you have that correlate,
the better you know exactly what is going on. …
So I have
had a lot of experience looking at photographs. I have looked at
many, many different kinds of photographs, from many, many different
platforms on many, many different countries, around the
world.
Interviewer:
OK. So on September the 11th, in 2001, what hit the Pentagon?
General
Stubblebine:
I don't know exactly what hit it, but I do know, from the photographs
that I have analyzed and looked at very, very carefully, it was not
an airplane.
We pride ourselves with the "free press." I do not believe
the "free press" is free any more. It's very expensive.
It's very expensive. And the press is saying what they have been told
to say about this.
General
Wesley Clark, U.S. Army (ret) –
Former
Commanding General of U.S. European Command, which included all
American military activities in the 89 countries and territories of
Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. Additionally, Supreme Allied
Commander Europe (SACEUR), which granted him overall command of NATO
military forces in Europe 1997 - 2001. Awarded Bronze Star, Silver
Star, and Purple Heart for his service in Viet Nam and numerous
subsequent medals and citations. Graduated valedictorian of his class
at West Point.
Video interview ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos 3/5/06:
"I think when you look at this country, right now, we need a 2-party system that works. We need Congress to do its job. We need real investigation of some of the abuses of authority that are apparently going on at the Executive branch. ... We've never finished the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence information it had. The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I've seen that for a long time."
Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Ford and Carter. U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. (PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. 22-year Air Force career. Also taught Mathematics and English at the University of Southern California, the University of Maryland, and Phillips University.
"Scholars
and professionals with various kinds of expertise---including
architects, engineers, firefighters, intelligence officers, lawyers,
medical professionals, military officers, philosophers, religious
leaders, physical scientists, and pilots---have spoken out about
radical discrepancies between the official account of the 9/11
attacks and what they, as independent researchers, have learned.
They
have established beyond any reasonable doubt that the official
account of 9/11 is false and that, therefore, the official
“investigations” have really been cover-up operations.
Essay:
"In
all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed
nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was
accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard
evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific
registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise
cause of the accident. ...
The
government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the
morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than
3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has
been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four
aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence
was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …
With
all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any
unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757
did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the
evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most
doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the
ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. …
As
painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the
lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and
nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be
involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history."
(Courtesy: http://www.physics911.net)
"A group of military and civilian US pilots, under the chairmanship of Colonel Donn de Grand [sic], after deliberating non-stop for 72 hours, has concluded that the flight crews of the four passenger airliners, involved in the September 11th tragedy, had no control over their aircraft.
In a detailed press communiqué the inquiry stated: "The so-called terrorist attack was in fact a superbly executed military operation carried out against the USA, requiring the utmost professional military skill in command, communications and control. It was flawless in timing, in the choice of selected aircraft to be used as guided missiles and in the coordinated delivery of those missiles to their pre-selected targets."
The report seriously questions whether or not the suspect hijackers, supposedly trained on Cessna light aircraft, could have located a target dead-on 200 miles from take off point. It further throws into doubt their ability to master the intricacies of the instrument flight rules (IFR) in the 45 minutes from take off to the point of impact. Colonel de Grand said that it would be impossible for novices to have taken control of the four aircraft and orchestrated such a terrible act requiring military precision of the highest order." (Courtesy: http://www.amfirstbooks.com)
“September 11, 2001 seems destined to be the watershed event of our lives and the greatest test for our democracy in our lifetimes. The evidence of government complicity in the lead-up to the events, the failure to respond during the event, and the astounding lack of any meaningful investigation afterwards, as well as the ignoring of evidence turned up by others that renders the official explanation impossible, may signal the end of the American experiment. It has been used to justify all manners of measures to legalize repression at home and as a pretext for behaving as an aggressive empire abroad. Until we demand an independent, honest, and thorough investigation and accountability for those whose action and inaction led to those events and the cover-up, our republic and our Constitution remain in the gravest danger.” (http://www.opednews.com)
Statement
to this website 2/20/07:
"This
isn't about party, it isn't about Bush Bashing. It's about our
country, our constitution, and our future. …
Your
countrymen have been murdered and the more you delve into it the more
it looks as though they were murdered by our government, who used it
as an excuse to murder other people thousands of miles away.'
Account
of Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, Pentagon employee and eyewitness to
the events at the Pentagon on 9/11. "I believe the Commission
failed to deeply examine the topic at hand, failed to apply
scientific rigor to its assessment of events leading up to and
including 9/11, failed to produce a believable and unbiased summary
of what happened, failed to fully examine why it happened, and even
failed to include a set of unanswered questions for future research.
...
It
is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official
government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the
rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade
Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics.
...
There
was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked [Pentagon]
lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this
strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of
damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of
a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have
been apparent to the secretary of defense [Donald Rumsfeld], who in
an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred
to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a "missile".
...
I
saw nothing of significance at the point of impact - no airplane
metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged
building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon. ... all of us
staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such
debris, but what we expected to see was not evident.
"After
4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am 100% convinced
that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and
committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the
highest levels of our government. It is now time to take our country
back.
The
"collapse"
of WTC Building 7 shows
beyond any doubt that the demolitions were pre-planned. There is
simply no way to demolish a 47-story building (on fire) over a coffee
break. It is also impossible to report the building’s collapse
before it happened, as
BBC News did,
unless it was pre-planned. Further damning evidence is Larry
Silverstein's video taped confession in
which he states "they made that decision to pull [WTC 7] and we
watched the building collapse."
Statement
to this website 8/20/07: "I
started questioning the Sept 11, 2001 “story” only days after the
event. It just didn't make any sense to me. How could a steel and
concrete building collapse after being hit by a Boeing 767? Didn't
the engineers design it to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 707,
approximately the same size and weight of the 767? The evidence just
didn't add up. ...
At
the Pentagon, the pilot of the Boeing 757 did quite a feat of flying.
I have 6,000 hours of flight time in Boeing 757’s and 767’s and
could not have flown it the way the flight path was described.
I
was also a Navy fighter pilot and Air Combat Instructor, U.S. Navy
Fighter Weapons School and have experience flying low altitude, high
speed aircraft. I could not have done what these beginners did.
Something stinks to high heaven!
Where
is the damage to the wall of the Pentagon from the wings? Where are
the big pieces that always break away in an accident? Where is all
the luggage? Where are the miles and miles of wire, cable, and lines
that are part and parcel of any large aircraft? Where are the steel
engine parts? Where is the steel landing gear? Where is the tail
section that would have broken into large pieces?
I
also personally knew American Airlines Captain “Chick”
Burlingame, who was the captain of Flight 77 which allegedly hit the
Pentagon, and I know he would not have given up his airplane to
crazies!
And
at the Shanksville Pennsylvania impact site, where is any of the
wreckage?!!! Of all the pictures I have seen, there is only a hole!
Where is any piece of a crashed airplane? Why was the area cordoned
off, and no inspection allowed by the normal accident personnel?
Where is any evidence at all?
When
one starts using his own mind, and not what one was told, there is
very little to believe in the official “story”....
Every
question leads to another question that has not been answered by
anyone in authority. This is just the beginning as to why I don’t
believe the official “story” and why I want the truth to be
told."
Article
8/19/05:
Regarding
the impact at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001, 'When
you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of
airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the
fact the projectile's impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it
looks like the work of a missile. And when you look at the damage, it
was obviously a missile.'
(http://www.rense.com)
Maj.
Charles E. Dills, PhD, U.S. Air Force Reserves (ret) –
World
War II fighter pilot. 94 combat missions, 522nd Fighter Squadron,
27th Fighter Bomber Group, 12th Tactical Air Force, based in Italy.
Aircraft flown: Boeing Stearman PT-17 Kaydet, Vultee BT-13 Valiant,
North American T-6 Texan, Curtis P-40 Warhawk, Republic P-47
Thunderbolt, North American A-36A Apache-Invader, North American P-51
Mustang, Cessna UC-78 Bobcat. Flight instructor in P-40's.
Professor
Emeritus of Chemistry, California Polytechnic State University, San
Luis Obispo. Co-author of
Laboratory
Experiments for Organic Chemistry
(1978).
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition: Regarding the World Trade Center building collapses, 'Explosive destruction.' http://www.ae911truth.org
Capt. Russ Wittenberg, U.S. Air Force – Former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. Retired commercial pilot. Flew for Pan Am and United Airlines for 35 years. Aircraft flown: Boeing 707, 720, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777. 30,000+ total hours flown. Had previously flown the actual two United Airlines aircraft that were hijacked on 9/11 (Flight 93, which impacted in Pennsylvania, and Flight 175, the second plane to hit the WTC).
Video interview 9/11 Ripple Effect 8/07:
"I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11; the Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that's alleged to have hit the South Tower. I don't believe it's possible for, like I said, for a terrorist, a so-called terrorist to train on a [Cessna] 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it's design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns, exceeding -- pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G's. And the aircraft would literally fall out of the sky. I couldn't do it and I'm absolutely positive they couldn't do it."http://americanbuddhist.net
Article 7/17/05: "The government story they handed us about 9/11 is total B.S. plain and simple." … Wittenberg convincingly argued there was absolutely no possibility that Flight 77 could have "descended 7,000 feet in two minutes, all the while performing a steep 280 degree banked turn before crashing into the Pentagon's first floor wall without touching the lawn."…
Capt. Daniel Davis, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director. Decorated with the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal for bravery under fire and the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam. Also served in the Army Air Defense Command as Nike Missile Battery Control Officer for the Chicago-Milwaukee Defense Area. Founder and former CEO of Turbine Technology Services Corp., a turbine (jet engine) services and maintenance company (15 years). Former Senior Manager at General Electric Turbine (jet) Engine Division (15 years). Private pilot.
Statement
to this website 3/23/07: "As
a former General Electric Turbine engineeringspecialist and manager
and then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that
none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the
four planes that crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed,
burned, shattered or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes, but
not destroyed. Where are all of those engines, particularly at the
Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, those engines,
plus wings and tail assembly, would be there.
Additionally,
in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical Director for
the Chicago-Milwaukee Air Defense and as a current private pilot,
there is no way that an aircraft on instrument flight plans (all
commercial flights are IFR) would not be intercepted when they
deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop
communication with Air Traffic Control. No way! With very bad luck,
perhaps one could slip by, but no there's no way all four of them
could!
Finally,
going over the hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right
at the wall/ground interface is nearly impossible for even a small
slow single engine airplane and no way for a 757. Maybe the best
pilot in the world could accomplish that but not these unskilled
"terrorists".
Attempts
to obscure facts by calling them a "Conspiracy Theory" does
not change the truth. It seems, "Something is rotten in the
State."
And there are hundreds of more statements from the experts. To read the details, please go to the following website.
(Courtesy: http://patriotsquestion911.com/)
***********
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.