Your Colonial
Masters,
The White Evil
Empire
(US-UK-Zionists)
Always The Same Actors
Massacred Millions of People
In The War Theaters
Around The Globe
Criminal ‘Famine Plot’ Killed
Millions In Iran,
India, Ireland &
Malaysia While Freedom Fighters
Were Burned Alive In Kenya
And South
Africa!
(M. Javed Naseem)
 |
| (A new study has found that at various times the British have invaded almost 90 per cent of the countries around the globe. The analysis of the histories of almost 200 countries in the world found only 22 which have never experienced an invasion by the British – The Telegraph) |
“The greatest patriotism is to tell
your country
when it is behaving
dishonorably,
foolishly, viciously.”
―
―
They have conquered Europe! Now, they are trying their best to colonize Asia and Africa again because the liberated nations in those continents have the capacity and the potential to fight back evil and derail the train of tyranny. Using fake news with the help of yellow media and the Presstitutes, they are twisting the facts again to start a new war on Iran, because Iran is supplying the Houthis in Yemen with arms and ammunition to repel the UK invasion (using Saudi Arabian + Israeli military services) there.
British Govt. Killed 10
Million Iranians in 1919
(Pub. 12 July, 2019, by GeoPolitics)
A recently rediscovered document in the American Archives
reveals that around 10 million Iranians died as a result of widespread famine
between 1917-1919.
The Iranian famine is barely mentioned by Western media or
in the history books, probably due to the fact that it was caused by the
British presence in Iran
after World War I.
Khamenei.ir reports:
After the Russian Revolution of 1917, Britain became the main foreign power in Iran and this
famine or – more accurately – ‘genocide’, was committed by the British. The
document in the American Archives, reporting the widespread famine and spread
of epidemic disease in Iran,
estimates the number of the deceased due to the famine to be about 8-10 million
during 1917-19, making this the greatest genocide of the 20th century and Iran the
biggest victim of World War I.
It should be noted that Iran had been one of the main
suppliers of food grains to the British forces stationed in the empire’s South
Asian colonies. Although bad harvest during these two years made the situation
worse, it was by no means the main reason why the Great Famine occurred.
Prof. Gholi Majd of Princeton University writes in his book,
‘The Great Famine and Genocide in Persia’, that American documents show that
the British prevented imports of wheat and other food grains into Iran from
Mesopotamia, Asia, and also the USA, and that ships loaded with wheat were not
allowed to unload at the port of Bushehr in the Persian Gulf. Professor Majd
argues that Great Britain
intentionally created genocide conditions to destroy Iran, and to effectively control
the country for its own purposes. Major Donohoe describes Iran of that
time as a “land of desolation and death”. But this event soon became the
subject of a British cover up.
******************************************
A new study has
found that at various times
the British have
invaded almost 90 per cent
of the countries
around the globe. The analysis
of the histories
of almost 200 countries in the
world found only
22 which have never
experienced an
invasion by the British
-- The Telegraph
******************************************
Britain
has a long record of its several attempts to conceal history and rewrite it in
their own favor. The pages are filled with conspiracies that were covered up by
the British government to hide its involvement in different episodes that would
tarnish the country’s image. One of the clear examples is the “Jameson Raid”; a
failed coup against Paul Kruger’s government in South Africa. This raid was planned
and executed directly by the British government of Joseph Chamberlain under the
orders of Queen Victoria.
In 2002, Sir Graham Bower’s memoirs were published in South Africa,
revealing these involvements that had been covered up for more than a century,
focusing attention on Bower as a scapegoat for the incident.
The records that were destroyed to cover up British crimes
around the globe, or were kept in secret Foreign Office archives, so as to, not
only protect the United
Kingdom’s reputation, but also to shield the
government from litigation, are indicative of the attempts made by the British
to evade the consequences of their crimes.
The papers at Hanslope
Park also include the reports on the
“elimination” of the colonial authority’s enemies in 1950s Malaya; records that
show ministers in London knew of the torture and
murder of Mau Mau insurgents in Kenya
and roasting them alive. These records may include those related to Iran’s Great
Famine. Why were these records that cover the darkest secrets of the British Empire destroyed or kept secret? Simply because
they might ‘embarrass’ Her Majesty’s government!
A famine occurred in Ireland from 1845 until 1852 which
killed one fourth of the Irish population. This famine was caused by British
policies and faced a large cover up attempt by the British government and crown
to blame it on ‘potatoes’. The famine, even today, is famous in the world as
the “potato famine” when, in reality, it was a result of a planned food
shortage and thus a deliberate genocide by the British government.
The true face of this famine as a genocide has been proven
by historian Tim Pat Coogan in his book: ‘The Famine Plot: England’s Role in Ireland’s Greatest Tragedy’
published by Palgrave MacMillan. A ceremony was planned to take place in the US to unveil Coogan’s book in America, but he was denied a visa by the
American embassy in Dublin.
(Courtesy: https://geopolitics.co/2019/07/12/british-government-killed-10-million-iranians-in-1919/)
Britain is responsible
for deaths of 35 million Indians, says acclaimed author Shashi Tharoor
By Shehab Khan, (The Independent, UK, pub 13 March, 2017)
The Congress MP also calls for the Victoria Memorial in
Kolkata to be turned into a museum about colonial rule.
Britain
was responsible for the deaths of 35 million Indians, according to Shashi
Tharoor.
The Congress MP made the claim in an article for Al Jazeera
and also called on the Victoria Memorial in Kolkata to be turned into a museum
about British rule.
Mr Tharoor is also an author, and penned the book An Era of
Darkness: The British Empire in India
and had previously called on Britain
to pay reparations to its former colonies.
“It is time that it be converted to serve as a reminder of
what was done to India by the British, who conquered one of the richest
countries in the world (27 per cent of global gross domestic product in 1700)
and reduced it to, after over two centuries of looting and exploitation, one of
the poorest, most diseased and most illiterate countries on Earth by the time
they left in 1947,”
he wrote in an Al Jazeera column.
“…Nor is there any memorial to the massacres of the Raj,
from Delhi in 1857 to Amritsar in 1919, the deaths of 35 million Indians in
totally unnecessary famines caused by British policy,” he added.
 |
| (The Bengal famine of 1943 was the final British-administered famine in India and claimed around three million lives. When Winston Churchill was asked to stop shipping desperately needed foodstuffs out of Bengal, he said Indians were to blame for their own deaths for ‘breeding like rabbits.’ Image: Shutterstock, CC BY) |
Britain
ruled India from 1858 until
1947 and several of Mr. Tharoor’s articles and speeches discussing the era have
gone viral and triggered mass support in India.
In the past he has referred to former British Prime Minister
Winston Churchill as “a thoroughly unpleasant scoundrel”.
Mr Churchill is not remembered fondly in India and during the Bengal famine
in 1943, where up to three million people died, the war-time Prime Minister
refused to send aid and said it was the fault of the Indians for “breeding
like rabbits”.
How Britain stole $45 trillion from India
And lied about it.
(By Jason Hickel, al-Jazeera, pub 19 Dec., 2018)
There is a story that is commonly told in Britain that the colonisation of India - as horrible as it may have been - was not of any major economic benefit to Britain itself. If anything, the administration of India was a cost to Britain. So the fact that the empire was sustained for so long - the story goes - was a gesture of Britain's benevolence.
New research by the renowned economist Utsa Patnaik - just published by Columbia University Press - deals a crushing blow to this narrative. Drawing on nearly two centuries of detailed data on tax and trade, Patnaik calculated that Britain drained a total of nearly $45 trillion from India during the period 1765 to 1938.
It's a staggering sum. For perspective, $45 trillion is 17 times more than the total annual gross domestic product of the United Kingdom today.
How did this come about? It happened through the trade system. Prior to the colonial period, Britain bought goods like textiles and rice from Indian producers and paid for them in the normal way - mostly with silver - as they did with any other country. But something changed in 1765, shortly after the East India Company took control of the subcontinent and established a monopoly over Indian trade.
It was a scam - theft on a grand scale. Yet most Indians were unaware of what was going on. Some of the stolen goods were consumed in Britain, and the rest were re-exported elsewhere. The re-export system allowed Britain to finance a flow of imports from Europe, including strategic materials like iron, tar and timber, which were essential to Britain's industrialization. Indeed, the Industrial Revolution depended in large part on this systematic theft from India.
On top of this, the British were able to sell the stolen goods to other countries for much more than they "bought" them for in the first place, pocketing not only 100 percent of the original value of the goods but also the markup.
(Ironically, India
is doing the same thing to Pakistan
by buying Pakistani pink salt for pennies under a 1940’s agreement, and selling
it, and its by-products as Indian products, to other countries at exorbitant
prices. The cheap salt was meant for the consumption of Indian population
only).
How did this work?
Basically, anyone who wanted to buy goods from India would do
so using special Council Bills - a unique paper currency issued only by the
British Crown. And the only way to get those bills was to buy them from London with gold or
silver. So traders would pay London
in gold to get the bills, and then use the bills to pay Indian producers. When
Indians cashed the bills in at the local colonial office, they were
"paid" in rupees out of tax revenues - money that had just been
collected from them. So, once again, they were not in fact paid at all; they
were defrauded.
Meanwhile, London
ended up with all of the gold and silver that should have gone directly to the
Indians in exchange for their exports.
This corrupt system meant that even while India was running an impressive trade surplus
with the rest of the world - a surplus that lasted for three decades in the
early 20th century - it showed up as a deficit in the national accounts
because the real income from India's
exports was appropriated in its entirety by Britain.
Some point to this fictional "deficit" as evidence
that India was a liability
to Britain.
But exactly the opposite is true. Britain intercepted enormous
quantities of income that rightly belonged to Indian producers. India was the
goose that laid the golden egg.
(Courtesy: https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/britain-stole-45-trillion-india-181206124830851.html)
An "untold
holocaust" which caused the deaths of almost 10 million people over 10
years beginning in 1857.
(From: The Guardian, UK)
India's
secret history:
'A holocaust, one where millions disappeared...'
A controversial new history of the Indian Mutiny, which
broke out 150 years ago and is acknowledged to have been the greatest challenge
to any European power in the 19th century, claims that the British pursued a
murderous decade-long campaign to wipe out millions of people who dared rise up
against them.
In ‘War of Civilisations: India AD 1857’, Amaresh Misra, a
writer and historian based in Mumbai, argues that there was an "untold
holocaust" which caused the deaths of almost 10 million people over 10
years beginning in 1857. Britain
was then the world's superpower but, says Misra, came perilously close to
losing its most prized possession: India.
Conventional histories have counted only 100,000 Indian
soldiers who were slaughtered in savage reprisals, but none have tallied the
number of rebels and civilians killed by British forces desperate to impose
order, claims Misra.
"It was a holocaust, one where millions disappeared. It
was a necessary holocaust in the British view because they thought the only way
to win was to destroy entire populations in towns and villages. It was simple
and brutal. Indians who stood in their way were killed. But its scale has been
kept a secret," Misra told The Guardian.
**************
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.