The Partnership of Evil
Terrorism, Killings And The
Game of Lies & Deceptions
Blood on The Hands of US-EU-Israel
(M. Javed Naseem)
The leaders (of
countries) responsible for
the massacre of
millions of innocent Muslims
(including
children and women) are today
shedding
crocodile tears over Paris
Those who have
been trampling humanity are
complaining of
attack on humanity today!
إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ
كَفَرُواْ يُنفِقُونَ أَمْوَالَهُمْ لِيَصُدُّواْ عَن سَبِيلِ ٱللَّهِ
فَسَيُنفِقُونَهَا
ثُمَّ تَكُونُ عَلَيْهِمْ حَسْرَةً ثُمَّ يُغْلَبُونَ
وَٱلَّذِينَ
كَفَرُوۤاْ إِلَىٰ جَهَنَّمَ يُحْشَرُونَ
“The unbelievers spend
their wealth to
hinder (man) from the
path of Allah, and
so will they continue
to spend. But in the
end they will have
(only) regrets and sighs.
At length they will
be overcome; and the
unbelievers will
be gathered together to Hell.”
(al-Quran 8:36)
The Almighty, Who created us, has also given us the plan of
actions. He told us what to do in certain situations. Today, the Unbelievers
are committing the acts of terror, killing innocent people, and blaming it on
the Believers (Muslims) so that they could wage wars and invade their
countries.
وَٱلَّذينَ كَفَرُواْ
بَعْضُهُمْ أَوْلِيَآءُ بَعْضٍ إِلاَّ
تَفْعَلُوهُ تَكُنْ
فِتْنَةٌ فِى ٱلأَرْضِ وَفَسَادٌ كَبِيرٌ
“The unbelievers are
protectors, one of
another. Unless you
do this, (protect each
other), there would
be tumult and oppression
on earth, and great
mischief.”
(al-Quran 8:73)
Now, if the Unbelievers can join hands in the ‘partnership
of evil’, why can’t Muslims unite together and thwart such acts of aggression?
Allah has commanded them in the Holy Quran to “enjoin good and forbid evil”.
Naturally, if Muslims disobey Allah, they would be punished and humiliated by
the cursed criminals.
They want you to live in fear and surrender your rights in
the name of security and safety – your safety! This will make their mission
easier – the mission to control and enslave you, and plunder the wealth and
resources of the world. That’s the Zionists’ New World Order!
They create a ‘bogeyman’ whenever the need arises and when
one is outdated, they replace it with the new one (Al-Qaeda, Taliban, Pakistani
Taliban, Al-Shabab, ISIL, ISIS , Daesh, IS –
Islamic State, etc.). Every bogeyman they create, has to be linked to Islam or
Muslims providing them with a pretext to attack some oil-rich
strategically-important Muslim country. They kill innocent people in cold blood
to make their case.
Putin: ISIS financed from 40 countries,
including G20 members.
From: RT. Published: 16 Nov, 2015
President Vladimir Putin says he’s shared Russian
intelligence data on Islamic State financing with his G20 colleagues: the
terrorists appear to be financed from 40 countries, including some G20 member
states.
During the summit, “I provided examples based on our data on
the financing of different Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) units by
private individuals. This money, as we have established, comes from 40
countries and, there are some of the G20 members among them,” Putin told the
journalists.
CFR: ‘The FSA Needs
Al-Qaeda Now’
From: CFR (Council on Foreign Relations)
Published: Aug. 2012
“The Syrian rebels would be immeasurably weaker
today without al-Qaeda in their ranks. By and large, Free Syrian Army (FSA)
battalions are tired, divided, chaotic, and ineffective. Feeling abandoned by
the West, rebel forces are increasingly demoralized as they square off with the
Assad regime's superior weaponry and professional army. Al-Qaeda fighters,
however, may help improve morale. The influx of Jihadis brings discipline,
religious fervor, battle experience from Iraq
‘American-allied nations are
secretly helping ISIS
to grow’:
--- Ann Wright
(US Colonel and
former diplomat)
From: RT-TV, Published: 8 Sep., 2014
“In 2003 I did resign from the Federal government. I actually
had order to retire from the military; I was a U.S.
diplomat, and I was one of the three diplomats who resigned in opposition to
the war in Iraq .
And I do feel that there are so many similarities now, 11 years later, with the
issue that the Obama administration is bringing forward, and they are seeming
intent that they will be using military force to resolve the further issues in
Iraq, and perhaps even in Syria.”
Palestine-Israel issue:
How the international community has pressured Israel
- has been ineffective, mainly because it really hasn't used the full force
that it has at its disposal. The U.S.
itself could do much more to pressure Israel
to stop the illegal settlements of which they have just announced that they are
annexing a thousand acres of Palestinian land into Israel . The pressure to stop the
occupation of the West Bank and to lift the siege of Gaza - these are things that have been
demands of the Palestinians for the longest time. The U.S. is the greatest pressure point of Israel , because we give Israel almost $3bn a year in
military assistance alone, plus all sorts of economic incentives.
The U.S.
is allowing itself to be pressured by very large and well-funded Zionist lobby
that works for the protection of the State of Israel, and works primarily in
the U.S. Congress to threaten the U.S. Congress people that if they don’t vote
for pro-Israeli issues then they will be turned out of office.
The Israeli propaganda is that “ISIS is Hamas, Hamas is ISIS ”. Well, that’s just not true. Hamas was elected as
the governing body of Gaza .
The level of violence that is between Palestinians and Israelis is
overwhelmingly from the Israeli side towards the Palestinian side - there’s no
doubt about that. Over 2000 Palestinians were killed versus 64 Israelis in this
latest attack, and in 2009, fourteen hundred Palestinians versus 11 Israelis…
Hamas does not have 24 hour drone coverage over Israel , it does not have F-16 that are bombing Israel every single day as is happening with the
Israelis in their naval attacks and ground attacks, and air attacks on Gaza . So, there’s a very
distinct difference in the level and the proportion of violence in there.
From: RT-TV
‘No terrorist group can
survive unless some govt. finances it’: Loretta Napoleoni (Terror
Economy expert)
Published: 15 Dec, 2014
In many ways terrorism works just like a business, and a
costly one - the organization needs arms, supplies, and each recruit needs to
be fed and equipped; it all costs money. But where do terrorists get their
money? How are the atrocities financed? Is jihad even possible when you have
no-one to back it with a hefty sum? And can a terror group become independent?
We ask these questions to economist and expert of the terrorist financial
world, Loretta Napoleoni, on Sophie&Co today.
Follow @SophieCo_RT
Sophie Shevarnadze: Loretta Napoleoni, economist,
author, expert on the financing of terrorism, welcome to the show, it’s great
to have you with us. Now, I’ve heard you speak in one of your speeches, you’ve
said a parallel economic system exists today, and you called it “the economy of
terror”. You said it’s worth $1.5trln – and that was before 9/11. So, I’m just
wondering, how big is this terror economy today!
Loretta Napoleoni: It’s about, I would say, 5% bigger than
it was before 9/11. But of course, distribution of the money is completely
different. There is much more activity in the Muslim world than there was
before. Most of the money moves in cash from place to place, when before it
moved through normal international banking system. So there are few changes
that have taken place.
About one third of this economy is actually linked to the
legitimate economy. So, they do business with each other. I’ll give you an
example – what is happening now in Iraq in the wheat industry. The
Islamic State controls about 40% of the production of wheat in Iraq . The
government buys all the wheat and controls price of wheat because it is very
important to keep it under certain level. So, they actually bought the wheat
from the regions controlled by Islamic State. This is a good example of how a
legitimate government actually does business with terrorist organization.
I think we are in a sort of contraction of the world’s
economy, most countries are in recession. If somebody comes and gives you an
opportunity to do an investment in cash – you’re not going to ask where the
money comes from. I would say that the black market economy also has increased
tremendously since 2008.
One of the examples that I used in one of my books is what
happened in Northern Ireland
during the time of IRA. The IRA controlled every single transportation system,
which was private, privately-owned; so each time you went into a taxi, without
knowing you were actually funding the IRA.
Another example could be taxpayers in countries that are
bankrolling armed organisations. For example, in the U.S. today we have an
involvement, and even in Europe we have an involvement with certain groups who
are fighting the Islamic State in Syria and in Iraq – so money are going in
that direction to buy weapons, or to help them in their effort to fight the
Islamic State. Some of these groups, for example the PKK, is still considered a
terrorist organization, by the U.S.
and also by Turkey .
There is this kind of really surreal situation taking place, because the world
has changed tremendously since the end of the cold war.
(Courtesy: https://www.rt.com/shows/sophieco/214403-terrorism-business-money-jihad/#.VkdKFV363H4.facebook
From: SCG
(Storm Clouds Gathering)
Real Objective:
Removing Assad From
Power
“A lot of attention is being put on Syria , because
that's where the largest numbers (of refugees) are coming from. Hundreds of
thousands are fleeing a conflict that has raged since 2011, and many are using
this to push for an escalation of military force by the West. Because,
obviously, if we bomb the heck out of the place, everything will go to normal.”
Of course it sounds perfectly rational to take down ISIS , these guys are nasty, but upon closer inspection we
find that the West is much more focused on removing President Assad from power.
That might strike you as absurd, considering that the Syrian government is one
of the last forces preventing ISIS from
completely taking over the region. But it makes much more sense once you see
how ISIS rose to power in the first place. Who
funded them? Who armed them? Oh they don't like to talk about that, do they?
Since at least 2011, the U.S.
and its allies have been backing rebel groups in Syria , the goal of course being
‘regime change’. This escalated right after they had finished toppling Libya .
There's a reason for that. The weapons from Gaddafi's armories were shipped
through Turkey into Syria and
distributed to combatants. Even at the time it was clear that the
majority of these weapons were ending up in the hands of Jihadists.
The official narrative was that these rebels were freedom
fighters, and that this was an organic uprising, an extension of the Arab
Spring. The media and the political establishment in the both United States and Europe
stuck to this story until it became impossible to hide the atrocities being
committed by these so called freedom fighters.
A Dept. of Defense document from 2012 showed that the U.S. government was fully aware of the fact that
these fighters were connected to AQI or Al-Qaeda in Iraq
(ISIS before they re-branded). The document
showed that the U.S.
knew that the fighters they were supporting intended to form a caliphate.
Not only did they know what was happening, they viewed it as
a good thing. In fact in 2012, the CFR released an article openly stating that
“In short, the FSA needs al-Qaeda now”.
Publicly Washington
continued to claim that the West was only assisting the "moderate
rebels", the FSA in particular. However, the FSA was very open about the
fact that they regularly conducted joint operations with Al-Nusra, and Al-Nusra
had direct alliances with ISIS .
No matter how you cut it, the U.S.
and its allies brought ISIS to power, and in
doing so they created a flood of refugees.
And let's not forget how this all started. Who toppled Iraq and Afghanistan creating a power
vacuum, unleashing decades of chaos and destruction, and creating breeding
grounds for extremists? It's no accident that these are among the top countries
of origin for refugees.
While it might be convenient for Europeans to pin the blame
entirely on the U.S. , the
reality of the matter is that European leaders have not only enabled Washington by refusing
to call them out, but they also played an active and direct role in the
aggression. The blood is on their hands too, so it's not in their interest to tell
you the truth.
**********
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.