And WW-III Continues
We Know Who Started It,
But Who Would Be Blamed?
The War Games!
(M. Javed Naseem)
وَإِذَا قِيلَ لَهُمْ لاَ تُفْسِدُواْ فِى ٱلأَرْضِ قَالُوۤاْ إِنَّمَا نَحْنُ مُصْلِحُونَ
أَلاۤ إِنَّهُمْ هُمُ ٱلْمُفْسِدُونَ وَلَـٰكِن لاَّ يَشْعُرُونَ
“When it is said to them: "Make not mischief
“When it is said to them: "Make not mischief
on the earth", they say: "Why, we only want
to make peace! Of a surety, they are the ones
who make mischief, but they realize (it) not.”
Under Obama, the
military developed U.S.
the most expensive and most dangerous
nuclear bomb ever: The B61-12. The B61-12
is a guided nuclear missile, the first of its kind,
and its yield can be dialed down electronically
for the desired effect.
The 9/11 saga has played its part effectively, therefore, they don’t discuss it any more. It has achieved more results than what was targeted. Today, ISIL or ISIS is the hot topic. It’s funny that most people in the world know that it was created by those who claim to be fighting it today! It gives them still an excuse to bomb
again and again till the desired results are achieved. They are running out of
time as they are already behind schedule. Syria has taken too much time.
The WW-III is going on and every year a new country or a nation is dragged into it. The evil is spreading its wings. The hawks in Anglo-American politics are constantly intimidating
Russia. They tried it in Georgia, in Ukraine
and now in Syria
– and one day they’ll succeed. They got encouraging results from Palestine, Afghanistan,
Iraq, Sudan and Libya. But there’s a possibility
might prove different.
United States and alone possess Russia
a total of over 15,000 nuclear warheads (as
of 2014), each of which are 10 to 30 times
more powerful than those that the
Japan in Hiroshima
and . Nagasaki
A nuclear war between just these two countries,
utilizing only the weapons which are slated to be
active after the implementation of the START
treaty in 2018, would release over 150 million
tons of debris into the atmosphere. This debris
would block out the sun, dropping global
temperatures between 8 and 30 degrees
centigrade. Agriculture would become
impossible. Mass extinctions would follow,
and our species would not likely be exempt.
And there is also the possibility of
Israel making a mistake of attacking Iran as it is
running out of patience. They want to do it before Iran acquires nuclear capability.
They are holding back under American pressure.
World War is upon us. It has been unfolding in slow motion for years. The only question now is who will get blamed.
Humans tend to view each stage of history in isolation. As a result they rarely see the chain reactions that build over decades, until a flash point catches their attention.
September 11th, 2001 was one such flash point. You could make the case that this was where it all began. There's some truth in that, but it's also an oversimplification.
“If you want to start a war, the unwashed
masses must be convinced (brainwashed) to
send their brothers, sons and fathers to die
on the front lines. The specter of an external
enemy must be etched into their collective
mind through trauma, exaggeration and
repetition. History must be whitewashed,
twisted and cherry picked down to a
politicized nursery rhyme. At no point
should the real motives or the consequences
of such an endeavor be discussed.”
Hillary Clinton: We created Al-Qaeda …
The video link:
Of course the dancing with the stars version of the story: The U.S. backed the Mujahedin in response to the Soviet invasion of December of 1979.
You might want to run that version by Robert Gates, director of the CIA under Ronald Reagan and George Bush Senior, and Secretary of Defense under both George W. Bush and Barack Obama, because in his memoir entitled "From the Shadows", he revealed that the U.S. actually began the covert operation 6 months prior, with the express intent of drawing in the Soviets.
“The Carter administration began looking at the possibility of covert assistance to the insurgents opposing the pro-Soviet, Marxist government (in
of President Taraki at the beginning of 1979. On March 5, 1979, CIA sent
several covert action options relating to Afghanistan to the SCC. The
covering memo noted that the insurgents had stepped up their activities against
the government and had achieved surprising successes. It added that the Soviets
were clearly concerned about the setbacks to the Afghan communist regime and
that the Soviet media were accusing the United
of supporting the insurgents. The SCC met the next day and requested new
options for covert action.”
“The day before the SCC meeting on April 6 to consider Afghan covert action options, Soviet MO Arnold Horelick sent Turner a paper on the possible Soviet reactions … The risk was that a substantial
U.S. covert aid
program could raise the stakes and induce the Soviets to intervene more
directly and vigorously than otherwise intended.”
“The meeting was finally held on July 3, 1979, and — almost 6 months before the Soviets invaded
Afghanistan — Jimmy Carter signed
the first finding to help the Mujahedin covertly. It authorized support for
insurgent propaganda and other psychological operations in Afghanistan;
establishment of radio access to the Afghan population through third-country
facilities; and the provision either unilaterally or through third countries of
support to the Afghan insurgents, in the form of either cash or nonmilitary
supplies. The Afghan effort began relatively small. Initially, somewhat more
than half a million dollars was allocated, with almost all being drawn within
“On Christmas Eve and Christmas Day, 1979, the Soviets massively intervened in
A covert action that began six months earlier funded at just over half a
million dollars would, within a year, grow to tens of millions, and most
assuredly included the provision of weapons.”
(‘From The Shadows’ (1996) by Robert Gates pp. 144-149)
Truth About 9/11:
And they still haven’t learned their lesson.
Speaking of Al-Qaeda, if you do a Google search for "Jet fuel maximum burning temperature" you'll find an article from ‘popularmechanics.com’ informing you that under ideal conditions jet fuel tops out at 1500 degrees Fahrenheit, and that steel melts at 2750 degrees. They go on to explain how it isn't a problem because "for the (WTC) towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt".
Trouble is, the steel DID melt.
Of course little details like the laws of physics never got in the way of a good story.
Oh by the way, did you ever find anyone who could credibly explain how a third building, World Trade Center building 7, fell straight down at 5:21 pm that day though it was not hit by any plane?
See the video:
And did they ever explain how the BBC reported this event 26 minutes before it actually happened?
Oh I know what you're thinking: maybe it was a green screen and shoddy editing, and that we can't confirm the actual time from that clip. Or can we? Turns out, there was a second clip that did show the time: 21:54. That's 9:54pm in
and 4:54pm Eastern – 26 minutes BEFORE the building actually fell.
The invasions of
were not motivated by the fall of the twin towers. Nor was the invasion of your
rights and privacy that followed. To say 9/11 was a pretext would be putting it
See the video:
The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry, but George W. Bush sure did try.
became quagmires, just like Cheney predicted.
Obama picked up where he left off by toppling
Libya and funding extremist in Syria (the precursors of ISIS). They
knew the weapons were ending up in the hands of Jihadists since at least
2012. They knew what would come next.
A Department of Defense document from 2012 (acquired through an FOIA request) shows that the
government was aware that these fighters intended to form a caliphate, and that
this conflict would likely lead to a proxy war with Russia
Middle East was being Balkanized.
Every pocket of resistance broken up into bite-sized chunks, but it was taking
too long, so Saudi Arabia
invaded Yemen, and Israel did
their part by repeatedly bombing the Syrian army (the most recent attack was in
July). Oh, and Turkey
helped too! It's been a team effort.
In 2013, when the
backed rebels in Syria got
caught using Sarin gas against civilians and the western narrative fell apart, Russia became a diplomatic thorn in Washington’s sight. So
like a true gambler doesn't know when to walk away, Obama doubled down by
backing the coup in Ukraine,
installing a puppet government with extensive ties to the U.S. State
Department, bankrolling their ethnic cleansing campaign in the East and blaming
the entire mess on Vladimir Putin: “Russian aggression, Russian aggression,
Afghanistan, Libya and Syria
to rubble is about spreading democracy, but accepting the results of a peaceful
referendum in Crimea … well that's just beyond
The war on the Ukrainian front continued through 2014 and into 2015. Somewhere along the way, the preparations for an open conflict between the
U.S., Russia and China were normalized and brought
from the shadows. Open threats were leveled in full view. Coverage was
We've been through this before – weapons of mass destruction, human rights, Russian aggression ... new excuses, same goal.
It stands to reason that if we want to STOP a war we must reverse this pattern.
Let's start with a realistic look at the consequences.
and Russia alone possess a
total of over 15,000 nuclear warheads (as of 2014), each of which are 10 to 30
times more powerful than those that the U.S.
used against Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
During the Soviet era it was understood that a hot war between these two countries would inevitably lead to the use of these weapons, and would therefore be an act of mass suicide. This idea was so deeply engrained, that it had its own acronym: M.A.D. (Mutually Assured Destruction). In recent years scientists have realized that this should be taken as a literal truth, regardless of which side may suffer the most in the initial exchange.
A nuclear war between just these two countries, utilizing only the weapons which are slated to be active after the implementation of the START treaty in 2018, would release over 150 million tons of debris into the atmosphere. This debris would block out the sun, dropping global temperatures between 8 and 30 degrees centigrade. Agriculture would become impossible. Mass extinctions would follow, and our species would not likely be exempt.
This is a mild description. We're not even touching upon the direct consequences of the blasts, firestorms, and radiation poisoning or the secondary deaths caused by exposure, and disease.
In this context you might be inclined to believe that the use of these weapons would be completely off of the table. That every effort would be made to reduce stockpiles and that no new bombs would be built. Unfortunately this is not the case.
In recent years
U.S. strategists have begun to
promote the idea of ‘limited nuclear warfare’ with a focus on tactical nukes.
The idea being that smaller weapons are more effective because they
are actually usable.
This isn't just talk. Under Obama, the
developed the most expensive and most dangerous nuclear bomb ever: The B61-12. The
B61-12 is a guided nuclear missile, the first of its kind, and its yield can be
dialed down electronically for the desired effect.
This capability has been promoted by the CFR as a means of preemptively destroying
hardened missile silos.
Apparently, the Obama administration took these recommendations to heart, because Section 1063 of the NDAA of 2013, directed the U.S. Strategic Command to prepare a report assessing the capability of the U.S. military to destroy a network of tunnels in China and "the known hardened and deeply buried sites of foreign nations" with "conventional and or nuclear forces". While
Russia wasn't mentioned directly
here, it should be clear that they are on that list.
Those promoting this new stance claim that this is merely a new form of deterrence, but this line of argumentation (even if it were sincere), is fatally flawed.
A preemptive nuclear strategy, especially when discussed in public, sends a clear message to those who are being threatened that they themselves must strike first. And
do not possess dial-a-yield tactical nukes, so their preemptive strikes would
be full scale.
political establishment has a good reason to play chicken with all of our
lives, and the future of this planet. The balance of geopolitical and financial
power has been shifting, and not in Washington's
Pivots have failed, bilateral discussions have gotten nowhere, sanctions have backfired, trade agreements have stalled, influence has eroded ...
running out of options, and time.
The dollar denominated financial system has peaked. This is the end of a debt super cycle, and of the petro-dollar. The next leg down is going to be epic.
The powers that be would rather tip the board than lose the game. They'd rather take us to war than to take the blame. And if you let them get away with it, that's just the beginning.